|
Compression
set is the end result of progressive stress
relaxation, which is the steady decline in sealing
force that results when an elastomer is
compressed over a period of time. In terms of
the life of a seal, stress relaxation is like
dying, whereas compression set is like death.
Though
it is very difficult to accurately quantify stress
relaxation, compression set is easy to measure. ASTM D
395 details compression set testing for rubber
that will be compressed in air or liquid media.
Two methods are described (“A” for
constant force; “B” for constant deflection),
but the basic methodology is substantially the
same. Testing generally involves use of cylindrical
disk compression set test buttons (0.49" thick
by 1.14" diameter) taken from molded slabs.
In lieu of buttons, die-cut plied (stacked) samples
(0.070" thick by 1.14" diameter) may
be substituted. The buttons or plied samples are
placed between steel plates. In method A (see Figure
26), the plates are then forced together
using either a calibrated spring or a pre-defined
external force. In method B (see Figure
27), a bolt-tightened device and
steel spacers are used. Either way, compression
(normally 25% of original thickness) is held for
a given time (e.g. 22 hours) at a specific temperature
(e.g. 100° C), these last two variables based
on anticipated service conditions.
After
removal from the compression device and a 30-minute
cooling period, the specimens are measured using
a dial micrometer. Compression set can then be
calculated as either a percentage of original specimen
thickness or as a percentage of original deflection.
Because ASTM D 395 primarily describes the testing
of materials to be used in high temperatures, a
similar test procedure for materials to be used
in low temperatures is outlined in ASTM D 1229.
Though
a high degree of compression set is to be avoided,
other service variables (such as inadvertent fluid
swell or the intentional application of greater
squeeze) may compensate. Seals are most likely
to fail when there is both high compression set
and shrinkage. Table 2 shows
how several of the most commonly used sealing materials
respond to increasing temperatures.
Because
the elastomeric lip of a shaft
seal is not normally compressed, compression
set tests have limited applicability when it comes
to choosing a lip material. In relation to shaft
seals, compression set tests are most helpful when
a seal design calls for a rubber-covered outside
diameter (O.D.). This O.D. will need to maintain
tight contact with the housing
bore after installation, so being able to anticipate
the degree to which the rubber may set is important.
Of course, compression set tests find their widest
use in selecting materials for use as O-rings
and other static seals that rely on an
optimal degree of compression.
PHYSICAL
PROPERTIES MAIN PAGE
|
“The
extent to which these properties are present
in a material has a huge impact on the material’s
ability to function effectively as part of
a shaft seal.”

Figure 26

Figure 27

Table 2
|