|
Because
external contaminants (such as dust, dirt,
water, and mud) making their way into an assembly
can damage both a shaft
seal and its surroundings (including the shaft itself
and the housing
bore), seals in dirty environments often feature
a secondary
sealing lip. Whereas the function of the primary
lip is to seal in fluid, the function of this
secondary lip is to seal out contaminants. In some
particularly dirty and demanding applications,
more than one secondary lip may be utilized to
help keep the seal environment clean.
A
secondary lip (also known as a dirt
lip, dust
lip, or excluder lip) can take two forms: radial or
axial.
Though different, radial and axial dirt lips have
characteristics in common. Both originate at the heel of
the elastomeric member
in order to seal on the air
side (thus preventing harmful contaminants
from reaching the primary lip-shaft interface).
Unlike many primary lips, radial and axial dirt
lips are non-sprung, meaning they do not incorporate
a garter
spring into their design.
The
chief difference between a radial dirt lip and
an axial dirt lip is in orientation relative to
the shaft. A radial dirt lip extends radially
down toward the shaft (see Figure 188).
Depending on the specific seal design, a radial
dirt lip may or may not actually contact the shaft.
Radial dirt lips find their widest use in low speed
applications.
Rather
than extending toward the shaft like a radial dirt
lip, an axial dirt lip extends axially
up away from the shaft (see Figure
189). An axial lip makes contact
with a vertical surface, one that is perpendicular
to the centerline of the shaft. This surface is
typically a wear
sleeve, bearing surface, or housing. Studies
have shown that axial dirt lips last longer and
are thus preferable to radial dirt lips for excluding
dust and dirt in high-speed applications. Secondary
lips are compared in Table 65.
Various levels of contamination are classified
in Table 66.
EFFECTS
OF ENVIRONMENT MAIN PAGE
|
“The
environment in which a shaft seal operates
has a huge influence on the design of the seal.”

Figure
188

Figure 189

Table 65

Table 66
|