|
Measured
as a loss percentage based on original weight, abrasion
resistance is the resistance of a rubber compound to
wearing away by contact with a moving abrasive
surface. Whereas the cutting or nicking of a seal’s
surface is an instantaneous event, abrasive rubbing
or scraping is much more of a progressive phenomenon
that develops over time. Seals in motion are most
susceptible to abrasion. Hard compounds
tend to exhibit less abrasive wear than soft compounds,
but use of a harder compound can also increase friction in dynamic
seals, and increased friction generates seal-degrading heat.
Because
of the many potential variables (including heat
fluctuation and surface contamination), abrasion
resistance is hard to accurately measure. Testing
typically involves the uniform application of an
abrasive material (such as sandpaper) to the surface
of a sample. ASTM standards
describe three different abraders: D 1630 relies
on a National Bureau of Standards (NBS) abrader
(see Figure 21); D 2228
uses a Pico abrader (see Figure 22);
and D 3389 (also known as Taber Abrasion) employs
a double-head abrader and a rotary platform (see Figure
23). Regardless of the specific test
method, the relative amount of sample material
that is lost due to abrasion is a good indication
of abrasion resistance.
Generally
speaking, hydrocarbon-based elastomers tend
to offer better abrasion resistance than fluorocarbon elastomers. Polyurethane offers
the most outstanding abrasion resistance, while carboxylated
nitrile and hydrogenated
nitrile offer abrasion resistance that
is superior to other hydrocarbon-based elastomers.
PHYSICAL
PROPERTIES MAIN PAGE
|
“The
extent to which each of these properties is present
in a given material has a huge impact on the
material’s ability to provide an effective
seal.”

Figure
21

Figure 22

Figure 23
|