|
Many
manufacturers provide material test reports (also
known as technical reports or specification sheets)
as a service to aid their customers. These reports
show the performance of a cured rubber compound when
subjected to a variety of standardized ASTM tests.
Provided these tests mirror the anticipated service conditions,
you can use them to make an informed decision
regarding the compound’s suitability for
your application.
To
help you better understand just how much test reports
can tell you, let’s take a closer look at
a sample
report whose subject is the same 70 (Shore
A) durometer nitrile compound
that we dealt with in “Understanding
ASTM D 2000 / SAE J200.” As we go
through the report line by line, you’ll find
references to many of the most commonly used ASTM
tests. Keep in mind, however, that not every report
you see will (or should) cover all of these tests.
We’re including them here simply to help
you get better acquainted with as many tests as
possible.
A. This
first line tells you the absolute basics: you are
looking at a test report of “N470,” a
nitrile compound that has a durometer hardness of
70 (Shore A).
B. The
next item lists all of the ASTM specifications
to which the N470 material conforms. Each of these
are defined individually during the course of the
report, but for now, just recall from “Understanding
ASTM D 2000 / SAE J200” that each line call-out
entry corresponds to a particular test. For example, “EA14” is
an ASTM D 471 70-hour water
resistance test conducted at 100° C.
C. “Original
properties” are the initial attributes of
the material. Information in this and all subsequent
entries is broken into two columns: the “specification” (what
is required to be acceptable) and the properties
(or response) of the “N470” nitrile.
There are six different original properties on
this report: 1) Hardness, 2) Tensile
Strength, 3) Elongation,
4) Modulus at
100%, 5) Tear
Resistance, and 6) Specific
Gravity. Note that specific gravity (SG) is
not specified on the report; rather, it is a reported
figure to be used as a quality control criterion.
The SG of N470 (1.25) is understood relative to
water’s SG of 1.00. Compound N470 is 25%
heavier than water.
D. The
first test on this report is “heat
resistance” (also known as heat
aging or air aging).
Per the line call-out, our nitrile is a Grade 2 “BG” compound.
This would normally send you to the D 2000 or J200
documents, where you would turn to the “BG
Materials” section of Table 6 and see data
similar to that shown in Table 22.
You’ll see that “A14” is the
suffix designation for “heat resistance” as
gauged by ASTM D 573, a 70-hour test conducted
at 100° C.
Why,
then, is A14 not listed among the additional suffix
requirements in this material’s line call-out?
It is omitted from the call-out because there are
no A14 specifications for Grade 2 BG compounds.
In Table 22, the Grade
2 column across from row A14 is empty, so the heat
resistance specifications column in our sample
report is blank. When there are no specifications,
a material cannot be said to “conform” to
a given test, and the corresponding suffix designation
is not listed in the call-out. We’ve chosen
to include heat resistance on this report because
it is a common test used to gauge resistance to oxidation and
thermal attack over time. You’ll no doubt
see it regularly on test reports, and it will likely
be specified in three properties: 1) Hardness Change,
2) Tensile Change, and 3) Elongation Change.
E. The
second test is “compression
set” (B14 in the line call-out) as determined
by ASTM D 395, a 22-hour test conducted at 100° C.
This report lists one property specification related
to compression set: Percent of original deflection,
which is specified at a 25% maximum. In this instance,
the N470 test specimen takes a 14% set. Be aware
that a number of factors other than the compound
itself can greatly affect compression set results,
including the test temperature and the sample thickness.
F. The
third test is “water resistance” (EA14
in the line call-out) as determined by ASTM D 471,
a 70-hour test conducted at 100° C. This report
lists two property specifications related to water
immersion: 1) Hardness Change and 2) Volume
Change.
G. The
next four tests gauge fuel and oil
resistance (EF11, EF21, EO14, and EO34 in the
line call-out). In each case, there are four property
specifications: 1) Hardness Change, 2) Tensile
Change, 3) Elongation Change, and 4) Volume Change.
Per J200 / D 2000, EF 11 is the suffix designation
for ASTM D 471, a 70-hour test conducted at 23° C
using Reference Fuel A. That’s good to know,
but you’re probably wondering what EF11 and
the other fluid resistance tests can really tell
you about a compound.
Put
simply, fluid resistance tests give you an indication
of how the compound will react when brought in
contact with fuels and oils. In most cases, the
primary concern is swelling,
though compound degradation is
also common. Recall that volume changes (either
swell or shrinkage)
are typically accompanied by changes in physical
properties, including hardness, tensile strength,
modulus, elongation, tear resistance, and compression
set.
ASTM
Reference Fuels A through K (see Table
17) have been specifically selected
to test compounds in contact with gasolines or
diesel fuels. Which tests are called for depends
on which fluid(s) the
seal will encounter. For example, Reference Fuel
A (used in the EF11 test) is a 100% isooctane fluid
which mirrors the shrinking or low-swell effects
of gasolines composed primarily of straight-chain aliphatic (rather
than ringed aromatic) hydrocarbons.
If the compound in question will be used around
gasolines with a very high aliphatic content, then
an EF11 test is a good idea. Reference Fuel B (used
in the EF21 test) is a 70% isooctane-30% toluene
mixture. The toluene content lends the mixture
a level of aromaticity, enabling Reference Fuel
B to more closely approximate the swelling effects
of commercial gasolines.
The
other two fluid resistance tests on this report
are based on shrinking or swelling in lubricating
oils rather than fuels. EO14 is the suffix designation
for another ASTM D 471 test, this one lasting 70
hours and conducted at 100° C using Number
1 Oil. EO14 is commonly used to gauge elastomer shrinkage.
The time and temperature requirements for EO34
are identical to EO14, with the exception that
Industry Reference Material (IRM) 903 is used rather
than Number 1 Oil. EO34 is a common tool for gauging
elastomer swell. As with the Reference Fuels, the
choice of oils in testing is not arbitrary. Rather,
Number 1 Oil and IRM 903 are used because they
have an aniline
point similar to the aniline point of a fluid
to be found in service.
The
aniline point is the lowest temperature at which
equal volumes of aniline (an oily, colorless, and
poisonous organic liquid
derived from benzene) and the oil will completely
dissolve in one another. The aniline point is actually
a good measure of the aromatic content, or the
amount of unsaturated hydrocarbons
present in the oil. The higher the level of unsaturants,
the more easily the organic aniline can “step
in” to combine with the oil, and thus the
aniline point will be low. A low aniline point
is important because it translates to a higher
potential for swelling certain rubber compounds.
Number
1 Oil has the highest aniline point (124° C ± 1°)
of the ASTM test oils, meaning it typically causes
the least amount of rubber swell. As is clear by
looking at the EO14 volume change specification
(-10% to +5%), Number 1 Oil actually has the potential
to cause more shrinkage than swell. Testing with
Number 1 Oil is thus a common tool for gauging
oil-induced shrinkage due to plasticizer extraction.
IRM 903, on the other hand, has the lowest aniline
point (70° C ± 1°) among the test
oils and typically causes the greatest swell. Be
aware that IRM 903 is used in lieu of the now-obsolete
Number 3 Oil for EO34 testing.
H. The
eighth test is “impact brittleness” (also
known as low-temperature brittleness; Z1 in the
line call-out). Note that this is a three-minute
test conducted at -25° C. Per ASTM D 2137 (Method
A), low temperature tests are normally conducted
at -35° C, -40° C, or -55° C. For example,
if this test had been conducted at -40° C,
F17 would have been noted in the line call-out.
Because this test was conducted at a non-standard
temperature (-25° C), it is noted in the line
call-out using a special “Z” suffix.
(Per D 2000 / J200, special suffix requirements
begin with a “Z” and must be specified
in detail, including test methods.) Our report
has one specification related to Z1, which is conducted
on a pass-fail basis only: No cracks in
the material after it is struck once. N470 passes
this test.
On
some reports, you may also see a “temperature
retraction” TR-10 listing. Though TR-10 is
not covered by a D 2000 suffix, ASTM D 1329 does
detail TR-10 as a way to gauge a compound’s crystallization and visco-elastic properties
at low temperatures. In this case, specification
is for the material to remain viable at -25° C.
N470 passes this test. For more on TR-10 testing,
see Quality
Assurance: Low Temperature Effects.
I. The
ninth test is another special stipulation required
by the user of the material (Z2 in the line call-out).
In our example, “Z2” is “resistance
to marking.” There is one specification related
to this test, which is conducted on a pass-fail
basis only: Non-marking by the material. That is,
the compound should not leave any mark when wiped
on white paper with a 0.03 MPa contact
pressure. N470 passes this test.
In
some instances, a Z suffix may be used for something
as basic as a hardness reading, as with the specification
for a 75 (Shore
A) durometer fluorocarbon.
Because the line call-out system only allows three
digits for both durometer and
tensile strength (as with “714” indicating
a 70 durometer material with a tensile strength
of 14 MPa), it is not possible to specify a 75
durometer material in this way. A special Z suffix
would be needed.
|
“Provided
these tests mirror the anticipated service conditions, you can use them to make
an informed decision regarding the compound’s suitability for your
application.”

Table
22

Figure 56

Table
17

Figure 57
|